After a year, what do I regret on my countertop?

Natural stone or porcelain? Pros and cons of my choice.

A year ago, I renovated my kitchen and debated between a natural stone or porcelain countertop. After considering both options, I opted for natural stone. A year later, this is my experience with this material.

The moment to make the decision

It was a simple and enjoyable process. I felt supported every step of the way, which made the choice even easier. Porcelain appealed to me because of its durability and easy maintenance. However, the authenticity and unique character of natural stone, such as marble, convinced me it was the best option for my kitchen. Now, after a year of use, I can clearly identify the pros and cons of my decision.

Natural stone is wonderful in terms of aesthetics. My kitchen has a large center island, ideal for family gatherings and dinners with friends, and every time I walk into it, the texture and deep color of the countertop make me feel like I made the right choice. It's like having a unique piece in your home, and the feeling of luxury and elegance it brings is unmatched.

However, I have also learned some lessons that I would have taken into account when choosing:

Maintenance

Natural stone requires special care to maintain its beauty and functionality. It needs to be sealed regularly to protect it from stains and damage, something that a porcelain countertop doesn't require, as it's a highly resistant and durable material. In our home, where we're always cooking and experimenting with new recipes, keeping stone stain-free can be a challenge.

Stain and scratch resistance

Although stone is durable, porcelain is even more resistant to scratches and stains, which would have been beneficial. Natural stone is susceptible to stains from wine, coffee, and other liquids, which requires extra care.
Porcelain is extremely resistant to these types of stains. Its non-porous surface not only prevents the absorption of liquids but also better resists scratches and daily wear and tear. This added strength of porcelain would have been very beneficial in keeping my kitchen free of the stains that are inevitable during family dinners. Plus, its non-porous surface would have been perfect for when my kids get excited about helping me cook. This way, I could keep my kitchen in top condition without spending so much time cleaning it, which is ideal for our busy daily routines.

Investment

The initial cost of natural stone was significantly higher than porcelain, and I wonder if its added durability would have justified a switch. For example, porcelain would have better withstood my kids' antics, like using the countertop for art projects, spilling paint and markers.

Installation process

The natural stone installation was simple, although once the kitchen was installed, the marble worker had to measure and custom-make the piece. Similarly, porcelain tile also requires a measurement and custom-make process. Both materials require a careful and precise installation process.

Conclusions

A year later, although I love the natural beauty of my stone countertop, porcelain might have been a more practical and lower-maintenance option. I recommend considering both materials depending on your needs. Natural stone has the advantage that each piece is unique, with variations in color and pattern, which gives your countertop character and personality. On the other hand, if you're looking for something with more uniformity, porcelain is an excellent option, as it offers a consistent look. Think about what you value more: a unique piece with character, or a uniform, easy-to-maintain surface?

Do you have doubts about which countertop to choose?
Our team of expert designers is here to help you choose the countertop that best suits you. Get the most out of your kitchen with the help of our professionals.